Contact Us

Headquarters
London  Ontario  Canada

E-Mail:
info.cdncaf@gmail.com

CCAF Board

CCAF cofounders:
Paula Schuck
Laura Eggertson
Wendy Conforzi

Secretary:
Lee-Ann Sleegers

Webmasters

Richard and Lee-Ann Sleegers

Paula's Blog

Take a look at Paula's blog.
thriftymommastips.blogspot.com

Articles

A Girl and Her Dog: Autism Services Dogs and Sophie

posted Jan 2, 2012 6:21 AM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families




No Frill's owner Brian Macdonald with Sophie Davies-Hales, mom Dana and their newly certified Autism Services Dog Crosby
   Meet Sophie. She has a riot of dark brown curls, cheeks as round as apples, a little brother who likes to play dressup and a big sister. Sophie also has a whole host of largely invisible special needs, and now an autism service dog that shadows her every move. Sophie was adopted as a baby by Mom Dana Davies-Hales and Tony Hales. She was three when she was diagnosed with Fetal Alcohol Neurological Developmental disorder ( a condition that falls under the umbrella term of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, caused by prenatal alcohol exposure, and PDD-NOS ( pervasive developmental disorder - not otherwise specified - on the autism spectrum). She runs, is impulsive, lags developmentally, has significant sensory issues, and generally isn't aware of danger. Before her diagnosis, Mom and Dad began researching ways to better help their child be safe and grow to become independent in the world and they kept coming back to the idea of a service dog. Tonight they met with No Frill's owner Brian Macdonald to thank him for their contributions to President's Choice Children's Charities. The charity supports children with disabilities and Macdonald noted often that means helping to give families funds to modify their vehicle for a wheelchair. The charity gave $10,000 towards the extensive training involved in getting Crosby ready to help Sophie. Macdonald said he doesn't have a lot of opportunities to meet with the people their charity helps and it was great to see the impact their fundraising can have in person.
         There are many ways to access a service dog, but a lot of them can be very expensive because of the training involved. Dana and Tony discovered Autism Dog Services (http://www.autismdogservices.ca/) They are local to southwestern Ontario. "We just wanted to do the best thing for Sophie," Dana said. "Sophie has many meltdowns because of overstimulation, noises, sounds, lights. A service dog will help keep her calm and grounded. Before a service dog it was hard to take Sophie out in public because she would have many melt downs. She still sometimes has a hard time but is able to stay out longer because of having a service dog."


Wade Beattie is the founder and director of ADS. He began his career as a guide dog trainer/instructor at Canine Vision Canada and for the past 13 years, has worked with children with autism and their families. He has collaborated with some of the world’s leading guide and service dog trainers and was a pioneer in bringing autism service dogs to Canada. Crosby comes with a price tag of $18,000 and the Davies-Hales family has been actively raising money for well over one year. They've done barbecues and craft sales, collected pop cans and raffled off Westjet tickets. Needless to say the $10,000 contribution made by President's Choice goes a long way. The store constantly runs fundraisers in store. Customers can contribute at checkout or during specific campaigns. 
Autism Dog Services is a non profit organization. They are not funded by government, but rather the support of the community and their donations, as well as fundraisers from the community and the wait list families.
To date the family has raised $13,000. They are still hoping to raise the remainder - about $5,000 by the end of the year through donations and various fundraisers.

"Crosby offically became a certified service dog a few weeks ago when he passed the public access test. We couldn't be happier," said Dana.
In time Crosby is expected to help Sophie become more independent and simply calm her down when she begins to bolt or have a meltdown. Service dogs are beginning to be used with a wider range of disabilities than they once were. Children with FASD and/or autism have been shown to benefit often from the relationship, the grounding effect the dog has and the simple fact that the animal can help improve socialization skills. As well service dogs can help bridge the gap between children with Autism and society.

                                                  The costs of a service dog broken down are:

♥ purchase cost of the dog
♥ dog food
♥ veterinary care until the dog is transitioned into the new family's home (approx. 18 mths to 2 years)
♥ complete training of the dog to A.D.I. standards (http://www.assistancedogsinternational.org/Standards/)
♥ training for parents in the care and handling of the dog
♥ training the child and dog together as a team
♥ equipment and identification
♥ ongoing support as required for the working life of the dog
Or about $650 a month to train, foster and provide equipment, food and veterinary care.

If you wish to help or donate to Sophie's dog. You can visit http://www.autismdogservices.ca/
 just make a memo that your donation is for Sophie Davies-Hales dog, and to find out more about Sophie and fundraising events visit http://www.pawsforsophie.webs.com/

2010 CCAF Update

posted Feb 22, 2011 9:31 AM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

By Paula Schuck

Cofounder the Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

Hi and welcome to the Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families site

A little bit about us...

We are adoptive parents seeking to support other adoptive families.

Near the end of 2010 we had an incredibly busy time advocating politically at the provincial and federal levels of government. More than ever before, the coalition is seeing a genuine momentum and political desire to reach out to adoptive families and the greater community of the adoption triad and solicit ideas on how to better support families formed by adoption and how to improve the lives of Canada’s children.

In late November 2010, the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, otherwise known as HUMA began calling witnesses to testify to the parliamentary committee about federal support measures for adoptive parents. For several weeks the committee, expected to report back to the Canadian government some time this year, heard from adoptees, youth in care, aboriginal youth, adoptive parents, adoptive parent support groups, adoption agencies and advocacy groups such as the ACC and AdoptOntario. Laura Eggertson, a CCAF member and board member of the Adoption Council of Canada spoke to many issues needed across Canada, not the least of which is accurate data on numbers of children in care. Canada doesn’t currently maintain this information. Lee-Ann Sleegers and Paula Schuck, both CCAF members, spoke to the need for equitable employment insurance benefits for adoptive parents (currently adoptive families receive 15 weeks less paid leave than families formed in the typical fashion.) Which means our children, who often need more time to bond, attach and heal, get less time and our families are at a financial disadvantage from the start. The CCAF also noted the need for a national Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) strategy to support families raising children with this disability.

For the first time ever, the Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families was called to present in person and in written form to the Ontario government during their budget hearings in Toronto. Our appeal was centred on post-adoption supports and standardized subsidies that follow children once they are adopted into their forever homes. As well we noted again the need for supports for FASD.

Towards the end of 2010, various adoption advocacy and child welfare groups throughout Canada came together to form a new national advocacy working group to drive change forward for Canada’s children. The National Adoption Action Network is a group that draws members from all the provinces and includes as stakeholders: The Adoption Council of Canada, The Adoption Council of Ontario, The Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families, the Adoption Support Centre of Saskatchewan, adoptive parents, birth parents and adoptees. We at the CCAF are working hard on committees to further the unemployment insurance and maternity leave benefits issue and the need to make FASD a disability that is prevented when able, and understood, accurately diagnosed and supported.

Cofounder Wendy Conforzi also continues to work on the NACAC board bringing her views and perspective as a foster parent of over 30 years and an adoptive parent.

We are seeing more families using animal assisted therapies as a means to help children heal and to aid those with trauma, attachment disorders and neurological conditions like FASD. We at the CCAF continue to attend national and international conferences to bring our families more information about these types of therapies.

These are just a few of the successes of 2010. We are all volunteers here at the CCAF and I want to thank our board members for their sacrifices this year. We log long hours on these issues, often spending our grocery money to travel and advocate so that other families will not have to.

If you can offer any support, we are in need of:

  1. Volunteers to help with letter writing campaigns and other tasks as needed. An accountant that can help us at year’s end is also very much needed.

  2. Funds to help us do what we do.

  3. A graphic artist to help us design a logo for the CCAF.


My first: Mommy

posted Jan 26, 2011 1:00 PM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

The Star

2010/12/31 00:01:00
LAURA EGGERTSON SPECIAL TO THE STAR

My daughter Miranda was 8 years old the first time she called me “Mommy.”

Children who spend time in foster care, as Miranda did, usually have many Moms. By the time I adopted her, at least six women in her life, including her birth mother, had filled the mother role. She called many of them, including Evelyn, her last foster mother, Mom. It was an easy way to blend in with the other kids in the household.

When she came to live with me, Miranda called me “Mom” almost right away. Even as a novice parent, as excited as I was, I knew it was far more significant to me than her. She confirmed that, later, during the abysmally horrible teenage years, when she told me I was just another in a long line of mothers.

But “Mommy” — that's something else. “Mommy” means your child has let down her guard. She's feeling vulnerable, and at the same time trusting enough to creep closer. Saying “Mommy” is like saying “home.”

My first “Mommy” moment came in a phone call. It was near the end of a workday at the Toronto Star's Parliament Hill bureau, some weeks after Miranda had bravely jettisoned the life she knew and arrived to live with me.

I've long since forgotten why she called. A question about when I would pick her up from her after-school program, or the need for a permission form the next day.

What I remember is answering the phone in my busy reporter's voice. I heard this little voice say, “Mommy?”

It took a moment to register. Then I realized, with part shock and part thrill, that she was talking to me. That I really was a mother — and my identity (and my life) had forever changed.

Other friends who have adopted older children have had similar experiences.

Jim joined my friend Kim and Buddy's family in Boston when he was 15. He called them Mom and Dad right away, Kim says — “but it sounded a lot more like ‘Hey' and ‘Hey you'.”

It wasn't until Jim was 18 and had behaved in a way he expected would get him thrown out of the house that the meaning behind the names he called his parents finally sunk in. Instead of disowning him, Kim and Buddy stood by him. They asked how they could help.

“That was when I knew they really were my Mom and Dad and I called them that as a connection, not just a name,” Jim said later.

Kim's two daughters, Tanya and Christine, did not begin to call her Mommy until they had gone through illness and trauma, respectively, as young adults.

“As adults, both of them call me Mommy all the time,” says Kim.

My friend Joy's foster daughter used every version of Mom, Mommy, Mama and Mother to preface endless questions. The constant demands for attention nearly drove Joy crazy.

One day, Joy was about to ask her to stop, when her daughter said, “Do you know how good it feels to have someone to call Mom?”

Today, my daughter Miranda is a mother herself. We're both anxiously awaiting her first daughter's first word — and that first “Mommy.”

I'm also waiting for the day Miranda will call me Mom again — or maybe even Mommy.

At 17, Miranda reunited with her birth mother, who has since died. The struggles with divided loyalties that plague many children adopted when they are older resurfaced. Miranda felt disloyal, I think, as if she was rejecting her birth family when she called me by a title that both of the women close to her heart had shared.

Now she calls me by my first name. It sounds awkward to me, and perhaps to her. I understand that the point is to create distance between us, especially when she feels on the verge of getting too close. She can't quite bring herself to acknowledge our relationship directly.

But I have learned, most days, to look past the words, and to wait when I get pushed away.

From Kim and Joy, I know these names our children call us — so fraught for these kids — are tied to both attachment and the trustworthiness we parents have to demonstrate.

You never know when a child bruised by life and passed from family to family will finally attach.

And I have had my Mommy moments. I still hear it, occasionally, from my second daughter, when she forgets she is too old for the more childish diminutive, or needs comfort.

As Miranda grows into motherhood herself, and hears “Mommy” on her daughter's lips for the first time, she will experience the power of the word.

I hope she will one day understand that you can have more than one mother, and love and honour them both.

Laura Eggertson is a freelance writer and editor in Ottawa.

B.C. youth watchdog slams decline in child protection audits

posted Dec 20, 2010 12:23 PM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

JUSTINE HUNTER

VICTORIA— From Tuesday's Globe and Mail
Published Tuesday, Dec. 14, 2010 1:17PM EST
Last updated Tuesday, Dec. 14, 2010 1:20PM EST

The B.C. government has radically cut back on internal audits meant to ensure child protection work is being properly carried out.

The audits, designed to monitor how quickly and how thoroughly social workers investigate child welfare complaints, have declined this year to roughly 200 reviews on more than 30,000 calls.

That’s an alarming decline, the province’s watchdog for children and youth said.

“The number is so low as to be insignificant as any meaningful measure,” said Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, the Representative for Children and Youth.

In 2006, when Ms. Turpel-Lafond’s office was created, the province conducted more than 1,100 audits. She said the public cannot have confidence that the province is serving vulnerable children well when those reviews are not taking place.

“They are the only reliable, valid, accepted tool to tell you how your system is doing,” Ms. Turpel-Lafond said in an interview.

The provincial government has set a pattern with the child protection audits, typically embracing the practice only when it is in the spotlight.

Audits were phased out in 1983, and then brought back 15 years ago, after Mr. Justice Thomas Gove delivered an indictment of the province’s system of child protection. Judge Gove investigated the death of Mathew Vaudreuil, a horrendously abused and neglected little boy who was killed by his mother despite numerous contacts with social services.

The Gove inquiry demanded, among other things, that government reinstate its audits to monitor the quality of services delivered by child welfare workers.

A decade later, retired judge Ted Hughes was appointed to investigate another tragic failure of the child protection system, the death of 19-month-old Sherry Charlie. His 2006 report found the system of audits had once again petered out. He stressed the need for effective audits to monitor the child welfare system to promote “continuous improvement of policy, standards and practice.”

Mary Polak, the Minister for Children and Family Development, said the government has found other ways to achieve the same results.

“There is no lessening of oversight just because there is a reduction in the number of audits being conducted,” she said in an interview. “The audit is only one mechanism for tracking and reviewing the way in which child welfare operates in British Columbia.”

Asked why the government has cut back on its audits, she said: “It really comes down to professional judgment with respect to how cases ought best be dealt with.”

She said the ministry is working to change to a broader reporting system, expected to be rolled out next spring. It is supposed to go beyond reviewing paper files by involving parents, youth and front-line workers.

She added that the ministry is also reporting to the watchdog, with monthly and quarterly meetings to share information on critical injuries and deaths.

“There is much closer collaboration between the two offices,” she said.

But that collaboration has been questioned by Mr. Hughes himself, who has repeatedly offered mediation to improve what he describes as a dysfunctional relationship between the ministry and its watchdog.

Last week, Ms. Polak sat down with Mr. Hughes. She said the meeting was positive, but maintained that her ministry has a good day-to-day working rapport with the Representative for Children and Youth.

Ms. Turpel-Lafond, however, said she has been frustrated by the ministry’s promise of “transformation” when she cannot see a concrete plan to replace the audit system with something better.

“When I review injuries and deaths, I see real frailties in the system,” she said. If complaints are not investigated quickly, she said, risks to children can escalate.

“What’s key for me is evidence-based reporting – actually demonstrating outcomes through regular, accurate information. It’s the key to restoring public confidence in this field.”

Prisons acting as 'hospitals by default'

posted Dec 20, 2010 12:21 PM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

Treatment of inmates with mental illness comes under fire

By JANICE TIBBETTS, Postmedia News December 15, 2010

Canadian prisons should not be "serving as hospitals by default," says a House of Commons committee report that recommends the government make a significant investment to help mentally ill and drug-addicted inmates.

Opposition members of the public safety committee, in a study released yesterday, make 71 recommendations on how the prison system can improve the lives of mentally ill inmates, ranging from cash infusions to curtailing double bunking and segregation, and simply building more cells with windows to let the light in.

Conservative members of the committee issued a dissenting report, asserting that the government has taken significant steps to help drug-addicted and mentally ill inmates.

The 97-page report, the outcome of months of public hearings in which the committee heard from dozens of witnesses, notes that about 80 per cent of offenders serving sentences of two years or more in Canada's 57 federal penitentiaries have problems with drugs or alcohol.

One in 10 male inmates and one in five female inmates suffer from serious mental disorders upon admission to prison.

"Correctional institutions should not be serving as hospitals by default," says the report. "This is a public safety issue because offenders who fail to receive appropriate treatment while in custody are more likely to reoffend after release, thus threatening the security of all Canadians."

The report recommends, "immediate allocation of additional financial resources," better training of police officers to recognize mental health problems, expansion of sweat lodges and other aboriginal healing methods, adding substance abuse counsellors and psychiatric nurses at every institution, restoring the recently axed prison farm program, and allowing more family and friend visits.

The government should "provide toilets and windows in every cell with access to sunlight and fresh air where possible," the report said.

The committee began the study following the death of Ashley Smith, a mentally ill New Brunswick teenager who killed herself while in custody in 2007.

© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette

Government of Canada Funds Program for Young Offenders With Mental Health and Substance Abuse Issues

posted Dec 20, 2010 12:18 PM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

Dec 17, 2010 2:40:00 PM

BELLEVILLE, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Dec. 17, 2010) - Daryl Kramp, Member of Parliament for Prince Edward-Hastings, on behalf of the Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M. P. for Niagara Falls, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, today announced funding to support youth with mental health and substance abuse issues who have come into conflict with the law.

"Our Government is proud of the innovative work done with our partners to help rehabilitate youth in conflict with the law who have unique needs," said Mr. Kramp. "Supporting these programs helps keep our communities safe by working with youth and addressing mental health and substance abuse issues in very direct ways."

 

Speaking at the open house for the new location of the John Howard Society of Belleville, Mr. Kramp announced $454,200 from the Youth Justice Fund toward its LifePlan and Coaching program. This program is aimed at helping youth with cognitive disabilities such as Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), mental health issues or substance abuse problems, who are involved in the criminal justice system. Through the creation of individualized plans, LifePlan works with the youth to develop individual goals related to education and training, employment, health and community contribution to assist in their reintegration into the community.

The Youth Justice Fund provides $5 million annually in grants and contributions to projects that encourage a more effective youth justice system, respond to emerging youth justice issues and enable greater citizen and community participation in the youth justice system.

Current priorities include addressing youth involved with gangs, guns and drugs; illicit drug abuse (under the National Anti-Drug Strategy); and youth in conflict with the law who are affected by FASD or mental health conditions.

To learn more about the Youth Justice Fund, please visit our Web site at www.justice.gc.ca/youth.

(Version francaise disponible)

Backgrounder: Youth Justice Fund

The Youth Justice Fund provides grants and contributions to projects that encourage a more effective youth justice system, respond to emerging youth justice issues and enable greater citizen and community participation in the youth justice system.

The Youth Justice Fund has three components:

--  Youth Justice Main Fund;

-- Drug Treatment; and

-- Guns, Gangs and Drugs.


Projects must meet at least one of the following objectives:

--  Establish special measures for violent young offenders;

-- Improve the system's ability to rehabilitate and reintegrate young
offenders;

-- Increase the use of measures, outside the formal court process, that are
often more effective in addressing some types of less serious offending;

-- Establish a more targeted approach to the use of custody for young
people; and

-- Increase the use of community-based sentences for less serious
offending.


The Fund supports the development, implementation, and evaluation of pilot projects that provide programming and services for youth in conflict with the law. It supports professional development activities, such as training and conferences, for justice professionals and youth service providers. Additionally, it funds research on the youth justice system and related issues.

Projects must target youth who are between the ages of 12 and 17 and currently in conflict with the law, or justice professionals and/or service providers who work with these youth.

To learn more about the Youth Justice Fund, please visit our Web site at www.canada.justice.gc.ca/youth

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Office of the Minister of Justice
Pamela Stephens
Press Secretary
613-992-4621

Department of Justice Canada
Media Relations
613-957-4207
www.canada.justice.gc.ca

Source: Department of Justice Canada

----------------------------------------------
Office of the Minister of Justice
Pamela Stephens
Press Secretary
613-992-4621

Department of Justice Canada
Media Relations
613-957-4207
www.canada.justice.gc.ca

Meeting – and losing – my birth father

posted Oct 2, 2010 6:08 PM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

Facts & Arguments Essay

Ian McLatchie

From Friday's Globe and Mail

Published Thursday, Sep. 30, 2010 6:19PM EDT

Last updated Thursday, Sep. 30, 2010 6:49PM EDT

My relationship with my birth father Mike was like a small animal that comes quickly into the world, finds its feet at once and moves intensely through its short life.

Within minutes of receiving my birth records I had discovered not only that my father was a writer and filmmaker whose work I knew, but that he lived almost within eyeshot of my home.

Time doesn't heal all wounds

We soon met and developed an immediate rapport. After that, everything followed a similar, accelerated pace. A year after our first contact he was dead, and I was left with a sense of loss far greater than the limited stock of memories on which it could feed.

It was a relationship many years in the making. I was born in Edmonton and grew up in a loving family in Calgary. I was told I was adopted at an early age. But it was not until my late teens that I began to understand how deeply rooted my cautiousness and insecurity were in the fact that I was adopted, and some time more before I felt the need to learn about my origins.

In my early 20s, I applied for information on my birth and was mailed documents that provided the basic circumstances (father 16, mother 18, unmarried), a few vital statistics, mother's surname and grandfathers' occupations. Not much, but enough to begin searching for my birth parents.

That's something I thought of doing many times, but never acted upon, even when Alberta instituted a policy of full disclosure of adoption records. Only after my wife and I retired from our teaching careers to her childhood home on the Sunshine Coast of British Columbia did I finally apply.

It's difficult to explain why it took me almost 35 years to take that final step, but it's something many adoptees will understand. The list of reasons not to begin a search was a lengthy catalogue of fears – fear of showing disloyalty to my adoptive family, of being rejected by my birth parents, of discovering nothing at all. And what if I made contact only to discover they were people I disliked or had nothing in common with? How could I break off relations with someone I had encouraged to be part of my life?

My decision to initiate a search had little to do with such seemingly obvious factors as wanting to learn my family history or discover if I had siblings. Apart from curiosity about any medical conditions to which my son or I might be susceptible, I had two primary motives: to hear my birth parents' story of why they gave me away, and to show them through my presence that, whatever hardships my birth caused them, I hoped I helped make it seem worthwhile by being the person I am today.

The birth record arrived last year within weeks of my application. It was an enormous file of medical and legal documents dating from a few months before and after my birth. The shock of discovering, a few pages in, that I had been conceived only miles from where I stood was indescribable, but nothing compared to learning that my father was the person I had heard interviewed on CBC Radio just days before. A Google search produced a detailed autobiographical sketch and a photo, and a glance at the phone book gave me an address. A process I had expected to take months was completed in under an hour.

The shock and exhilaration I felt over the next few days were predictable. But I was not prepared for the growing sense of resentment that I was dependent on this person to help me find the mother who, I quickly realized, had been almost the sole object of my search. My father, after all, was only 16 at the time of my birth.

How does one idealize a 16-year-old father? Had he been permanently affected by fathering a child at such an early age? Quite possibly, but probably not as deeply as a teenaged girl who underwent the pain and humiliation of an out-of-wedlock birth in the early 1950s. It was her I wished to contact, and he was the gatekeeper.

I waited another three weeks to send a letter to Mike. Within hours of its arrival I received a long, warm e-mail response. Two days later we were sitting in a café telling each other our life stories. To my surprise, he and my mother had married and had another three children. The couple divorced many years ago. She never remarried and had died just a few months earlier. Within weeks I had met Mike's second wife, my three siblings and two uncles – all extraordinarily warm and generous people who welcomed me as family.

I had no reference point by which to judge my relationship with Mike; neither, I suspect, did he. We both had full and satisfying lives, but making contact had unquestionably filled an absence we both felt. Particularly because of the small difference in our ages, it felt less like a father-son relationship than a reuniting of long-lost friends. We took pleasure in each other's company and pride in one another's accomplishments.

In December, 2009, Mike was diagnosed with prostate cancer. The treatments went well and it seemed that the disease was in remission, until a catastrophic series of complications kept him in hospital for weeks at a time. In July, word came that the cancer had hopelessly metastasized and Mike had come home to die.

I visited him twice in his last days. By the second visit he was semi-conscious, but on the first he was alert and coherent, although in obvious pain. He seemed genuinely unafraid to die and comforted me and everyone around him. I held his hand and we talked – a bit about death, but mostly about the ordinary things we always talked about. I told him I was proud to have been part of his life and how grateful I was for our year together.

“So am I,” he said. “I think we really made the most of it, didn't we?”

“Yes, we did.”

Ian McLatchie lives in Sechelt, B.C.

Government of Alberta

posted Aug 30, 2010 6:18 PM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

August 27, 2010
Alberta Recognizes International Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Awareness Day

Edmonton...
September 9 is International Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) Awareness Day. Each year on the ninth day of the ninth month, this day acts as a reminder to people around the world that during the nine months of pregnancy, a woman should abstain from alcohol.

“Exposure to any amount of alcohol during pregnancy can have devastating consequences for the baby that will last a lifetime,” said Alberta Children and Youth Services Minister Yvonne Fritz. “FASD Day is an excellent opportunity to remind your family and friends about the importance of abstaining from drinking alcohol during their nine months of pregnancy.”

Over 23,000 Albertans are affected by FASD, which includes a complex range of brain injuries and developmental, physical, learning and behavioural conditions that can result from drinking alcohol during pregnancy. Through a 10-year plan to deliver community-led programs and services, the Alberta government is committed to reducing the incidence and improving the quality of life for those living with FASD.

Supports and services available in Alberta include:

  • 12 FASD Service Networks that promote prevention of FASD and provide people affected by FASD and their caregivers with comprehensive supports that encourage them to reach their full potential at home, school, work and in their communities;
  • 20 FASD assessment and diagnostic clinics, available in hospitals and other medical centres;
  • videoconference learning opportunities for families, caregivers, professionals and organizations in communities across Alberta, with new sessions beginning September 29; and
  • resources for Albertans to assist with increasing public awareness and education in their communities including; posters, fact sheets, booklets, postcards and the latest Taking Action on FASD newsletter.

For more information about FASD in Alberta, the FASD Service Network nearest you, FASD prevention tools, and to register for the videoconference learning series, visit www.fasd-cmc.alberta.ca

-30-

Media inquiries may be directed to:
Tom Olsen
Children and Youth Services Communications
780-427-4801
tom.olsen@gov.ab.ca

To call toll free within Alberta dial 310-0000.

Autism Sensory Friendly Films AMC

posted Jul 19, 2010 11:05 AM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families

by Susan Harris

Staff Writer
Published: Jul 17, 2010

Autism Society of America launches sensory friendly films with AMC Theaters.

Sensory friendly films are part of a new program by AMC and Autism Society of America. AMC Theaters will provide the sensory friendly films setting for the Autism Society. Tickets are $4-6 to watch the films.

AMC Theaters will provide a more comfortable setting for this unique audience. The theater lighting will be brought up and the sound will be turned down. The families will be allowed to bring in their own gluten-free, casein-free snacks, and no previews or advertisements will be shown before the movie.

Additionally, audience members are welcome to get up and dance, walk, shout or sing. AMC's "Silence is Golden®" policy will not be enforced, unless the safety of the audience is questioned. Tickets are $4-6 depending on location and can be purchased on the day of the event.

Autism is a complex developmental disability that typically appears during the first three years of life. It affects a person's ability to communicate and interact with others. Autism is defined by a certain set of behaviors and is a "spectrum disorder" that affects individuals differently and to varying degrees.

Citizenship and Immigration Canada

posted Jun 11, 2010 7:15 AM by Canadian Coalition of Adoptive Families   [ updated Jun 17, 2010 11:59 AM ]

News Release

Moratorium imposed on adoptions from Nepal

Ottawa, June 4, 2010 – Canadian adoptions from Nepal have been suspended due to concerns about fraud and child trafficking.

A recent report by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (PDF format, 93 kb) revealed that there is strong evidence that documents are being falsified on a regular basis and false statements are regularly made about a child's origins, age and status – and whether they have been abandoned.

Based on this evidence, and the recommendations of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and with the support of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC), the provinces and territories have agreed to suspend adoptions from Nepal.

Provinces and territories are responsible for approving adoptions. CIC is responsible for granting the adopted child citizenship or allowing them to immigrate as a permanent resident. HRSDC’s role is to encourage communications and co-operation with provincial and territorial, federal, and foreign government counterparts in the adoption community.

“We know how disheartening this must be for the parents concerned, but several authoritative sources, such as The Hague Conference and UNICEF, have raised serious concerns about the use of fraudulent documents and the prevalence of child trafficking in Nepal,” said Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism. “It is important to get a reformed system in place in Nepal before proceeding with adoptions.”

Proceeding with adoption cases from Nepal could violate Canada’s obligations under The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoptions. Both CIC and HRSDC work in close coordination with provincial and territorial adoption authorities and are monitoring the situation in Nepal.

“There are a number of Canadian parents seeking to adopt children from Nepal who are understandably anxious but our priorities remain the best interests of the child and the prevention of child trafficking,” added Minister Kenney.

Follow us on Twitter at: www.twitter.com/CitImmCanada

For further information (media only), please contact:

Alykhan Velshi
Minister’s Office
Citizenship and Immigration Canada

Media Relations
Communications Branch
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
613-952-1650
CIC-Media-Relations@cic.gc.ca

1-10 of 40